Over the last couple weeks we have been hearing about how the OWS protests have grown to over 300 protests nationwide. Wow! This has got to be a big deal, or so the media would have me believe…
Most recently, while on vacation in Florida, I had the opportunity to see one for myself. We drove by a bank where there were 2 people and a dog outside in protest. This is one of the 300 protests? It came to me that the media is doing its best to hang on to something that barely exists; this was one of their protests. I said to myself, “If America could only see this.” I talked to a high-profile reporter from New York who recently blurted out the truth in his confusion when he said to me, “If you want to see the OWS in NY, you will have to look for it.”
Mark Twain rightly stated, “If you don’t read the newspaper, you ‘re uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you’re misinformed.”
How right is this statement for the present time, and a bit disturbing that you cannot trust those who report the news. Is it not interesting that the agendas pushed on the American people can hardly be justified in person? It seems to work only in presentation on the papers or the television screen. For example: It has been said from those behind the puppetry reporting on the news, “You take the pictures and I’ll create the war.”
I believe it is time to pull back the curtain on those who report the news, and do an expose’ on who they are, what they believe, and what they promulgate. America is wising up to the fact that there are only a few outlets worthy of their trust, and rightly so.
After seeing the video below you will understand why. Here is a taste of an expose’ on those who report the news:
First there was Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank who celebrated the repeal of the military’s Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell by saying, “For those who are worried about the radical homosexual agenda, let me put them on notice. Two down, two to go.” Barney Frank is a radical homosexual who hired a male prostitute – Steve Gobie – for sex, and let him live with him while he ran a prostitution ring out of his Washington, D.C. apartment. He even used his congressional office to clear minor charges for Gobie. Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank’s name was also brought up in a court testimony as being involved in a pedophile ring operation, and accused of having sexual relations with a boy who was brought to Frank’s home in MA.
Secondly, we have Kevin Jennings, Obama’s former “safe school czar,” who wrote the forward to a book called “Queering Elementary Education.” Kevin Jennings has made clear that Harry Hay is one of his heroes. Harry Hay is an icon for the organization NAMBLA (North American Man Boy Love Association – a known pedophile group) whose motto was “sex before eight before it’s too late” when marching in gay pride parades.
Thirdly, Jon Berry, who is an open homosexual in the Obama administration, was quoted as saying, “If we can get ENDA (Employment Non-Discrimination Act) enacted and signed into law, it is only a matter of time before all the rest (overturning the Defense Of Marriage Act) happens,” he continued, “It is the keystone that holds up the whole bunch, and so we need to focus our energies and attention there.”
Fourthly, Frank Kameny, another radical homosexual activist that surrounded the Obama administration, and who died this year on National Coming Out Day, said, “Bestiality is not my thing … But it seems to be a harmless foible or idiosyncrasy of some people. So, as long as the animal doesn’t mind (and the animal rarely does), I don’t mind, and I don’t see why anyone else should.” He also stated, “Your God of Leviticus (and of the whole Bible) is clearly a sinful homophobic bigot. He should repent of his sinful homophobia…” I wonder if Frank standing by what he said on that fearful day when he met his Maker.
And now we go to him who appoints these individuals in governmental positions, Barack Hussein Obama. Barry has now placed 225 homosexuals into key positions in our government, as well as a transvestite (https://www.glli.org/presidential).
And then there is Elena Kagan, Obama’s appointed Supreme Court Justice. If Elena is not being forced to recuse herself from Arizona’s immigration laws, America is shouting her down to recuse herself from Obamacare on possible counts of perjury.
Kagan attended Princeton, Oxford, and Harvard Law schools. She began her career as a professor at the University of Chicago Law School, leaving as Associate White House Counsel, and later as policy adviser, under President Clinton. She then became a professor at Harvard Law School and was later named its first female dean.
Here are the original mottos and student directives for Harvard, Princeton and Oxford, which Kagan attended:
Harvard’s original mottos are: “Truth For Christ and the Church” and “For the Glory of Christ.”
Harvard’s directives to students were:
Let every student be plainly instructed and consider well (that) the main end of his life and studies is to know God and Jesus, which is eternal life (John 17:3), and therefore to lay Christ in the bottom as the only foundation of all sound knowledge and learning… Everyone shall so exercise himself in reading the Scriptures twice a day that he shall be ready to give such an account of his proficiency therein.
John Witherspoon, founder and president of Princeton, required the following of his students:
Every student shall attend worship in the college hall morning and evening… (and) shall attend public worship on the Sabbath… (T)here shall be assigned to each class certain exercises for their religious instruction…and no student belonging to any class shall neglect them.
Witherspoon taught:
(H)e is the best friend to American liberty who is most sincere and active in promoting true and undefiled religion and who sets himself with the greatest firmness to bear down on profanity and immorality of every kind. Whosoever is an avowed enemy of God, I (hesitate not) to call him an enemy to his country.
Oxford’s original motto is taken from Psalm 27: “The Lord is my Light.”
Kagan, and the others above, are a disgrace to the founders of this God-blessed Christian nation. Our founders laid down their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor to ensure that America could remain a free and blessed nation. And it is our duty to magnify what they sacrificed for by holding our representatives’ accountable to the Constitution with a jealous love for freedom.
Watch the video below to see a list of Kagan’s abuses:
The Center on Education Policy recently reported that half of the schools in the U.S. are failing, blaming the defective No Child Left Behind Act passed into law by George W. Bush, and which Congress has failed to address.
Here’s a question for America: since when does the Federal government have any Constitutional authority over the education of your children? They don’t! The 10th Amendment states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
America, if you have your young people in a public school, you are allowing the next generation to feed upon everything that destroys who we really are as a People. If it’s not through No Child Left Behind (NCLB), which aims for the floor, then it’s through International Baccalaureate (IB), an unconstitutional, United Nations, global agenda.
Abraham Lincoln stated the truth when he said, “The philosophy of the school room in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next.” What is the government attempting to promulgate on this current generation? Point made.
I say so often that if we don’t sow righteousness into the up and coming generations today, they will be there to curse us tomorrow.
After performing lyceums in several hundred public schools across America, I noticed that three to five churches would compass each community. Day after day, week after week, the young are attending school 5 days a week and then church two days. I have often wondered what these young people were thinking when they were told by their parents and pastors how much they were loved, yet wondered why they were subject to indoctrination in public schools.
They teach humanism and evolution while they attempt to set the student at war with their Creator. They spew forth re-written history, the opposite of what our forefathers established by omitting the facts in textbooks. They also push sex education, which at length attempts to promote homosexuality and abortion. To make matters worse, the NEA refused to pass an amendment (I-24) that protects students from sexual misconduct by teachers. The list goes on and on…
America, we can teach what we know, but we can only reproduce who we are. Jesus rightly said that wisdom is justified by her children. This is not the wisdom our forefathers left us. God forbid that we complain about what we have raised up through OUR children. It’s time to show them love by demonstration and get them out of these unconstitutional indoctrination centers.
Watch a portion of Bradlee Dean’s “My War” about education:
“The boys of the rising generation are to be the men of the next, and the sole guardian of the principles we deliver over to them.”
Want to support the Sons of Liberty/You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International’s efforts to restore America to its Biblical and Constitutional foundation?
Homosexual Marriage – Not! Never in the History of Mankind!
By Bradlee Dean
Outside of the fact that there has never been such a thing as gay marriage in the history of mankind, the radical gay agenda attempts to push their “government backed” (Chai Feldblum, see video) illegal agenda regardless of what this God blessed Republic and it’s people have established through our Mosaic Institution called Common Law. In every state gay marriage has been voted on, it is voted down. What is it that these radical homosexuals don’t understand about the Law?
On January 1st, 2012, Hawaii became the seventh state to acknowledge same sex marriages with no legal premise to substantiate their unions. (Note: 3 of the 7 states are in some form of litigation to reverse the decisions.) And the perversion of it all is that the radical homosexuals want to be married in Christian churches. They are asking God to bless what He calls an abomination. I wonder what Bible these people are reading? God condemns homosexuality both in the Old and New Testaments (read Leviticus 18:22, Leviticus 20:13, Romans 1:24, 1 Corinthians 6:9, 1 Timothy 1:10, Jude 1:7).
Two pastors in Hawaii filed a lawsuit against the state, Governor Neil Abercrombie, and Dept. of Health director Loretta Fuddy. Why?
The pastors claimed that they needed a restraining order and injunction “to maintain their 1st, 5th and 14th Amendment rights, without being subjected to injunctions, fines and other penalties for refusing to rent their church grounds for same-sex ceremonies and receptions.”
A federal judge blocked their bid, claiming they lacked “legal standing,” when in fact, the judge, the state, and the governor are the ones who lack legal standing through their un-American policy. The pastors are not the ones who should be called into question; it is the state, the judge, and the governor that are usurping the Constitution of the United States and violating our Republican form of government (Read Exodus 18:21).
What happens when people say enough is enough to those who help this illegal agenda along? They will do what they did in Iowa when 3 judges who were part of the unanimous decision to legalize same-sex marriage were voted out. Christians and conservatives in the state took matters into their own hands and ousted the judges who acted as “legislators in robes.”
Like anything else, the radical gay agenda has to circumvent their movement through deceptive measures on the American people, or get their minions in government to do it for them. So, to the minions in government, I am putting you on notice: remember Iowa.
Want to support the Sons of Liberty/You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International’s efforts to restore America to its Biblical and Constitutional foundation?
School shootings and antidepressants: what’s the link?
By Bradlee Dean
The USAToday recently reported that the number of Americans taking antidepressants is soaring. This could possibly be in direct connection to the controversial TeenScreen survey given to children as young as 9 years old in public schools. TeenScreen has been responsible for policing the mental health of children over the past decade. It is of note that this mental screening process usurps parental rights over the care of their own children.
There used to be a day in America when parents loved their children enough to chastise them, because they taught them to know the difference between right and wrong, which is love. They understood that “foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him” (Proverbs 22:15).
But today, the pharmaceutical companies and their minions in government are at work trying to convince you that spanking your child is abuse rather than love. And their resolve is to label your child mentally ill (ADHD, ADD, etc.) and put them on dangerous psychotropic drugs called antidepressants. Read the antidepressant black box warning for yourselves and read the side effects on the inserts of antidepressant boxes. Some of the side effects include:
•Confusion
•Depersonalization
•Hostility
•Hallucinations
•Manic reactions
•Suicidal ideation
•Loss of consciousness
•Delusions
•Feeling drunk
•Alcohol abuse
•Homicidal ideation
Despite these horrific side effects, the number of anti-depressants being prescribed to children has doubled in the last nine years. More and more public schools have brought in TeenScreen, a manipulative survey for children that sets them up for an antidepressant prescription. For example, one of the questions asked is: “Has there been a time when you felt you couldn’t do anything well or that you weren’t as good-looking or smart as other people?” Another question is: “In the last year, has there been any situation when you had less energy than usual?” Who hasn’t felt that way in their life at some time or another?
Nearly 20% of students who take the survey are labeled mentally ill, which leads to a prescription for antidepressants. They are selling this process as suicide prevention, however, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force found “no evidence” that screening for suicide risk reduces suicide attempts. In the meantime, pharmaceutical companies are raking in hundreds of millions of dollars a day while our children are used as political and medical guinea pigs.
Another interesting fact is that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has never been proven. Dr. Edward C. Hamlyn, a founding member of the Royal College of General Practitioners in 1998 stated, “ADHD is fraud intended to justify starting children on a life of drug addiction.”
To take it a step further, the video below explores what is being overlooked, namely, the alarming studies which link antidepressants to school shootings:
Want to support the Sons of Liberty/You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International’s efforts to restore America to its Biblical and Constitutional foundation?
Barking up the Wrong Tree… Separation of Church and State in Context
By Bradlee Dean
Ruff, Ruff! Well, folks, if it is not the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) trying to unlawfully shut you up and give your enemies their supposed rights (their founder, Roger Baldwin, said, “Communism is the goal”), then it is, get this, an organization called Freedom from Religion (their name, by the way, is contrary to the First Amendment). Both organizations base their premise upon the falsified “separation of church and state.”
The phrase “separation of church and state” is nowhere in any founding document. It is, however, found in Article 52 of the USSR Constitution.
Article One of the Bill of Rights:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Last week, an Arizona chapter of Freedom from Religion attempted to sue Governor Jan Brewer in Maricopa County Court, objecting that Brewer “exhorted citizens to pray on January 17, 2010, when she proclaimed a Day of Prayer for the Arizona economy and state budget.” They can bark all they want, but they better find another country that will tolerate their hostilities, for in America, they are barking up the wrong tree.
Freedom from Religion happens to be the same group who came against the city of Athens, Texas (allegedly it was one of their own members) for the Nativity display on the lawn this Christmas. However, their ignorance and hostility only swelled the ranks of the righteous. In response to their hostilities, 5,000 Americans gathered around the Nativity to praise God for His Son, Jesus Christ, the Savior of the world.
Groups like these have not yet come to the understanding that our rights come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God. Therefore, if the state didn’t give us rights, they cannot take them away.
The two main architects of Article One are George Washington and Fisher Ames.
Fisher Ames said, “Should not the Bible regain the place it once held as a schoolbook? Its morals are pure, its examples captivating and noble.”
George Washington predicted the exact outcome of departing from religious obligations in his Farewell Address: “Reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious (Christian) principle.”
They knew that religious principles provided morality and self-control. That is the lifeblood for the survival of any self-governing community. Therefore, I say, “ruff, ruff.”
Watch Bradlee Dean live from Washington, D.C., to explain Thomas Jefferson’s coined phrase, “separation of church and state” in its original context:
Want to support the Sons of Liberty/You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International’s efforts to restore America to its Biblical and Constitutional foundation?
As the anniversary of Roe v. Wade approaches us this weekend, people need to understand that abortion was murder and illegal prior to, during, and after the 1973 decision.
The law of Nature and Nature’s God is perpetually in force throughout the earth. He specifically forbids the execution of an innocent life (Proverbs 6:17). Furthermore, the Constitution does not give any court the authority to make law. Judges can only render opinions that apply only to the parties that are before them.
However, in our culture today, there are some brilliantly moronic students of the “credentialed” elite, who don’t even need guns to force them to think a certain way; just tickle their ears, make some empty promises, and presto!, you have a community of the unashamed organized degenerates. But don’t forget – they have their “credentials.”
The good news is, the majority of Americans are not in this camp of cultural degenerates.
Speaking of degenerates, recently the “Captain of Criminal Degenerates” Eric Holder and his two-year political prosecution of Mary Susan Pine for holding a sign outside of an abortion clinic (preserving life) ended with the granting of summary judgment by an upright Judge Kenneth L. Ryskamp. Judge Ryskamp concluded that the government lacked evidence to prove “all three elements of its FACE (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act) claim.” The ruling was a chastisement of Holder for seeking to apply federal law in a clearly unconstitutional manner!
The laws against abortion still exist and they still apply to criminals, they are just not being enforced, and why would they be enforced by a President and Attorney General who make it a habit to break laws and use the force of law against those who uphold the law on a daily basis?
So, on the 39th anniversary of Roe vs. Wade, abandon the media message that our nation is “divided” on the issue. Rev. Frank Pavone comes to my aid when he stated, “Our nation is awakening to the fact that Roe’s policy – imposed by a Court rather than voted on by the people’s representatives — has never represented what the majority of Americans think about abortion.”
I leave you with the fact that even if the people democratically agreed with the ruling it would not change the immutable law of “Thou shalt not kill.” We the People can no more change law than can the judges we decry.
Video: Planned Parenthood’s minister of abortion. Guess who? Would you have aborted these famous people?
Want to support the Sons of Liberty/You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International’s efforts to restore America to its Biblical and Constitutional foundation?
You may have seen last week when Senator Rand Paul was detained by the TSA (Transportation Security Administration) for refusing to allow a pat down when the screener gave a false positive detection.
The TSA was looking for another excuse to put their hands on another American citizen in violation of our Fourth Amendment right, which states:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall NOT be violated…”
The only thing their scanners did detect was that Rand Paul had spine enough to resist their unlawful policy. Rand correctly made the distinction between rights and privileges.
Benjamin Franklin was right when he stated: “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.”
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney immediately responded: “When an irregularity is found in a TSA screening process, it must be resolved prior to allowing a passenger, any passenger, to proceed to the secure area of the airport.”
What is to be done when the “irregularity” is found within the TSA? And when that irregularity is found, then it becomes the responsibility of the American people to correct the crimes of the TSA when they will not correct themselves.
Take note: This is the same criminal administration that is at war with governors of states who are attempting to prevent illegals from entering this country, while allowing the TSA to violate American citizens. This government has labeled every single American citizen as a suspect in terrorism.
Again, the TSA has no lawful authority to put their hands on you. Why? Because it stands contrary to the United States Constitution.
The Supreme Court declared in 1803, “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”
I am all for safety and security, but not at the cost of giving up our rights that have been purchased at such a high price. The scanners are sufficient. Furthermore, airports are not required to have the TSA, which, by the way, have not successfully caught a single terrorist.
During an interview with Senator Paul, Megyn Kelly with Fox News stated it was only putting up red flags to the TSA when refusing an illegal pat down.
However, Megyn had it backwards. Let me put into perspective what the red flags truly are, namely the crimes of TSA employees toward those who go through security lines at the airport.
This video is the red flags on the TSA, which they didn’t want you to know:
Want to support the Sons of Liberty/You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International’s efforts to restore America to its Biblical and Constitutional foundation?
The Theory/Religion of Evolution Against the Facts!
By Bradlee Dean
Evolution is one of those topics that’s so absolutely ridiculous that I would even have to take the time to expose the theory/religion of evolution (and theory it is), but when it effects the outcome of future generations, it must take precedent. Take a look with me at the absurdities of people who blindly follow its teaching.
It has been said, “The philosophy of the classroom in one generation will the be philosophy of government in the next.” When people fall in line with the theory of evolution, and with those like Adolph Hitler who kill millions and millions of people because they weren’t quite as evolved, this is not only terrible, but also very dangerous.
As a matter of fact, until 1962, there were only 2-3,000 words mentioning the theory/religion of evolution in school textbooks. Conveniently, in 1962, the Supreme Court ruled to take prayer out of schools, thus removing God (the Giver of Law and the foundation of our Constitutional Republic) and ignoring 97 percent of the people who said to leave America’s Christian heritage alone. The outcome? America’s public schools exploded the mention of evolution in textbooks from 2-3,000 words to 33,000+ words.
The theory/religion of evolution teaches our kids a mindset that God does not exist (idolatry – the oldest sin in the Bible); that there are no moral absolutes; that some men are better than others; and that we evolved from monkeys. Then we wonder why, after teaching evolution in schools, America has an epidemic of school shootings, suicides, violence, rape, and crime.
If you can convince the people that God does not exist, then the government becomes god. Now what you are seeing today is the modern American government falling in line with the same theory/religion: away with God and onward with tyranny. How contradictory to our founders!
Benjamin Rush, signer of the Declaration of Independence, stated, “In contemplating the political institutions of the United States, if we were to remove the Bible from schools, I lament that we could be wasting so much time and money in punishing crime and would be taking so little pains to prevent them.”
Besides this, Charles Darwin himself didn’t believe his theory would stand up to the light of truth. He said in his book, The Origin of Species, “If it could be demonstrated that an organ exists, which could not have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.” If that’s the case, Charlie, what is the basis for any of your theories? There isn’t one.
Watch and laugh along with the video below that shows the baseless finding of those who attempted to verify the theory/religion of evolution against those stubborn things called facts:
Want to support the Sons of Liberty/You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International’s efforts to restore America to its Biblical and Constitutional foundation?
Last week in Los Angeles, a twisted teacher accused of spoon-feeding his semen to elementary school students is stuck in jail for the foreseeable future. A Los Angeles County judge jacked his bail to $23 million from the initial $2.3 million at the request of prosecutors. Apparently, this judge understands that justice is the guardian of liberty.
But on the other hand, soft judges produce hardened criminals. How many pederasts (homosexual crimes) with 52 counts of child sex abuse are released on a minuscule bail?
For example, Jerry Sandusky, former Penn State football coach and head of the prominent children’s charity, The Second Mile, is accused on 52 criminal counts (with eye-witnesses testifying) stemming from accusations he molested 10 boys between 1994 and 2008, using his position to seduce vulnerable boys into forced sexual acts with him. Allegations range from forced oral sex on an 11-year-old boy to an eye-witness account by graduate assistant Mike McQuery of anal sex on a boy about 10 years of age in the Penn State showers. One boy said he traveled with Sandusky to multiple bowl games where the coach forced oral sex in his hotel room. Sandusky once threatened to send the boy home early if he kept resisting, the victim testified.
Judge Leslie Dutchot was the first judge to preside over the case. She had to be replaced because she had been a volunteer at Sandusky’s charity, The Second Mile, and she raised many eyebrows by giving Sandusky a $100,000 unsecured bail, meaning he did not have to pay it unless he missed his next court date. Prosecutors had requested a $500,000 bail and an ankle monitor for Sandusky. They got neither.
This week Jerry Sandusky appeared in court laughing several times while trying to answer questions from the judge when he took the stand during a hearing to hash out pretrial issues between his attorney and prosecutors. And why wouldn’t he be laughing due to the fact that the judge concedes to every one of his requests? He can see his grandkids, drive to his attorney’s office, shovel snow on his driveway, and sit on his back porch watching elementary children play during recess, as his yard borders the school’s. The judge put a deaf ear no only to the 52 charges against him, but also to complaints of neighbors and school officials who saw him outside. Maybe Jerry should look at scripture before he chuckles next time (Matthew 18:6).
When this case first broke, I said on my radio program, The Sons of Liberty, the Sandusky scandal is just the tip of the iceberg to major pedophile rings in the United States.
Just when you didn’t think it could get any worse, former FBI director Louis Freeh has been hired to investigate the case. If you recall, Freeh was the FBI director during the Alfred P. Murrah building bombing. He was also involved in Waco and Ruby Ridge in the 1990’s. Is he the fox in the chicken coup or is he there to bring forth justice? You decide.
This sure sounds familiar. Does Boys Town ring a bell?
Want to support the Sons of Liberty/You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International’s efforts to restore America to its Biblical and Constitutional foundation?
It seems that every time someone such as myself attempts to encourage our Christian brothers and sisters to resist an unconstitutional or otherwise reprehensible government policy, we hear the retort, “What about Romans Chapter 13? We Christians must submit to government. Any government. Read your Bible, and leave me alone.” Or words to that effect.
No doubt, some who use this argument are sincere. They are only repeating what they have heard their pastor and other religious leaders say. On the other hand, let’s be honest enough to admit that some who use this argument are just plain lazy, apathetic, and indifferent. And Romans 13 is their escape from responsibility. I suspect this is the much larger group, by the way.
Nevertheless, for the benefit of those who are sincere (but obviously misinformed), let’s briefly examine Romans Chapter 13. I quote Romans Chapter 13, verses 1 through 7, from the Authorized King James text:
“Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. For this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God’s ministers, attending continually upon this very thing. Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor to whom honor.”
Do our Christian friends who use these verses to teach that we should not oppose President Bush or any other political leader really believe that civil magistrates have unlimited authority to do anything they want without opposition? I doubt whether they truly believe that.
For example, what if our President decided to resurrect the old monarchal custom of Jus Primae Noctis (Law of First Night)? That was the old medieval custom when the king claimed the right to sleep with a subject’s bride on the first night of their marriage. Would our sincere Christian brethren sheepishly say, “Romans Chapter 13 says we must submit to the government”? I think not. And would any of us respect any man who would submit to such a law?
So, there are limits to authority. A father has authority in his home, but does this give him power to abuse his wife and children? Of course not. An employer has authority on the job, but does this give him power to control the private lives of his employees? No. A pastor has overseer authority in the church, but does this give him power to tell employers in his church how to run their businesses? Of course not. All human authority is limited in nature. No man has unlimited authority over the lives of other men. (Lordship and Sovereignty is the exclusive domain of Jesus Christ.)
By the same token, a civil magistrate has authority in civil matters, but his authority is limited and defined. Observe that Romans Chapter 13 clearly limits the authority of civil government by strictly defining its purpose: “For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil . . . For he is the minister of God to thee for good . . . for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.”
Notice that civil government must not be a “terror to good works.” It has no power or authority to terrorize good works or good people. God never gave it that authority. And any government that oversteps that divine boundary has no divine authority or protection.
Civil government is a “minister of God to thee for good.” It is a not a minister of God for evil. Civil magistrates have a divine duty to “execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.” They have no authority to execute wrath upon him that doeth good. None. Zilch. Zero. And anyone who says they do is lying. So, even in the midst of telling Christians to submit to civil authority, Romans Chapter 13 limits the power and reach of civil authority.
Did Moses violate God’s principle of submission to authority when he killed the Egyptian taskmaster in defense of his fellow Hebrew? Did Elijah violate God’s principle of submission to authority when he openly challenged Ahab and Jezebel? Did David violate God’s principle of submission to authority when he refused to surrender to Saul’s troops? Did Daniel violate God’s principle of submission to authority when he disobeyed the king’s law to not pray audibly to God? Did the three Hebrew children violate God’s principle of submission to authority when they refused to bow to the image of the state? Did John the Baptist violate God’s principle of submission to authority when he publicly scolded King Herod for his infidelity? Did Simon Peter and the other Apostles violate God’s principle of submission to authority when they refused to stop preaching on the streets of Jerusalem? Did Paul violate God’s principle of submission to authority when he refused to obey those authorities who demanded that he abandon his missionary work? In fact, Paul spent almost as much time in jail as he did out of jail.
Remember that every apostle of Christ (except John) was killed by hostile civil authorities opposed to their endeavors. Christians throughout church history were imprisoned, tortured, or killed by civil authorities of all stripes for refusing to submit to their various laws and prohibitions. Did all of these Christian martyrs violate God’s principle of submission to authority?
So, even the great prophets, apostles, and writers of the Bible (including the writer of Romans Chapter 13) understood that human authority–even civil authority–is limited.
Plus, Paul makes it clear that our submission to civil authority must be predicated on more than fear of governmental retaliation. Notice, he said, “Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.” Meaning, our obedience to civil authority is more than just “because they said so.” It is also a matter of conscience. This means we must think and reason for ourselves regarding the justness and rightness of our government’s laws. Obedience is not automatic or robotic. It is a result of both rational deliberation and moral approbation.
Therefore, there are times when civil authority may need to be resisted. Either governmental abuse of power or the violation of conscience (or both) could precipitate civil disobedience. Of course, how and when we decide to resist civil authority is an entirely separate issue. And I will reserve that discussion for another time.
Beyond that, we in the United States of America do not live under a monarchy. We have no king. There is no single governing official in this country. America’s “supreme Law” does not rest with any man or any group of men. America’s “supreme Law” does not rest with the President, the Congress, or even the Supreme Court. In America, the U.S. Constitution is the “supreme Law of the Land.” Under our laws, every governing official publicly promises to submit to the Constitution of the United States. Do readers understand the significance of this distinction? I hope so.
This means that in America the “higher powers” are not the men who occupy elected office, they are the tenets and principles set forth in the U.S. Constitution. Under our laws and form of government, it is the duty of every citizen, including our elected officials, to obey the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, this is how Romans Chapter 13 reads to Americans:
“Let every soul be subject unto the [U.S. Constitution.] For there is no [Constitution] but of God: the [Constitution] that be [is] ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the [Constitution], resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. For [the Constitution is] not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the [Constitution]? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For [the Constitution] is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for [the Constitution] beareth not the sword in vain: for [the Constitution] is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake. For this cause pay ye tribute also: for [the Constitution is] God’s minister, attending continually upon this very thing. Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honor to whom honor.”
Dear Christian friend, the above is exactly the proper understanding of our responsibility to civil authority in these United States, as per the teaching of Romans Chapter 13.
Furthermore, Christians, above all people, should desire that their elected representatives submit to the Constitution, because it is constitutional government that has done more to protect Christian liberty than any governing document ever devised by man. As I have noted before in this column (See: https://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2005/cbarchive_20050630.html ), Biblical principles form the foundation of all three of America’s founding documents: The Declaration of Independence, The U.S. Constitution, and The Bill of Rights.
As a result, Christians in America (for the most part) have not had to face the painful decision to “obey God rather than men” and defy their civil authorities.
The problem in America today is that we have allowed our political leaders to violate their oaths of office and to ignore, and blatantly disobey, the “supreme Law of the Land,” the U.S. Constitution. Therefore, if we truly believe Romans Chapter 13, we will insist and demand that our civil magistrates submit to the U.S. Constitution.
Now, how many of us Christians are going to truly obey Romans Chapter 13?
A nation that does not remember what it was yesterday, does not know what it is today, nor what it is trying to do. We are trying to do a futile thing if we do not know where we have come from, or what we have been about.
– President Woodrow Wilson
How is it, America, that the left knows how to lie better than the right knows how to tell the truth? Just think: There would be no left if the right would do the right thing at all times.
Recently, I was asked my what my beliefs were during a radio interview. I said, “What do you mean ‘my beliefs’? It is OK for us to have different opinions as long as we are rooted in the same principles.” And here lies America’s problems. This is how the corrupt in government divide and conquer through the media, public schools and colleges: just blind them to their history.
When saying the Pledge of Allegiance, you recite, “… one nation under God, indivisible (cannot be divided, separated or broken), with liberty and justice for all.”
Can’t you just hear the unlearned college professor or philosopher (using big words with common-sense meanings) decry, “We are not a Christian nation”? They then complain about the government that will not be ruled by Law (our Mosaic institution; God gave government through Moses). In their confusion they blurt out the truth: They would rather listen to man’s 10,000 commandments than to God’s Ten Commandments, which only produce liberty when you love God in Christ.
In essence, the left is at war with God and His Law, which states: thou shalt not kill, commit adultery, steal, lie or covet. They seem to forget that “Wherever law ends, tyranny begins.”
President Andrew Jackson said, “The Bible is the rock upon which our republic rests.” And these are the principles that keep us united.
The University of Houston political science professors searched to find where the Founding Fathers chose their ideas:
•They assembled 15,000 writings from the era of the founders.
•They researched for 10 years, isolated 3,154 direct quotes and identified the source of the quotes:
1.8.3 percent were quotes from Baron Charles de Montesquieu;
2.7.9 percent were quotes from Sir William Blackstone;
3.2.9 percent were from John Locke;
4.34 percent of their quotes came directly from the Bible – and when researching where Montesquieu, Blackstone and Locke got their ideas, they found that theirs came from the Bible as well.
Here is the correlation between the Constitution and the Bible concerning America’s Christian heritage:
•Separation of powers: Jeremiah 17:9
•Immigration laws: Leviticus 19:34
•President must be natural born citizen: Deuteronomy 17:15
•Witness and capital punishment: Deuteronomy 17:6
•Three branches of government: Isaiah 33:22
•Tax exemptions for churches: Ezra 7:24
•Republicanism: Exodus 18:21
Watch the undisputable symbolism of America’s Christian Heritage below:
Watch the prayer that literally rocked the Capitol as Bradlee lays out our foundation to the Minnesota State Legislature:
Want to support the Sons of Liberty/You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International’s efforts to restore America to its Biblical and Constitutional foundation?
Presidential candidate Rick Santorum said this week, “Obama’s agenda is based on some phony theology. Not a theology based on the Bible. A different theology.” And then later suggested that the president practices a different kind of Christianity.
Immediately thereafter, Robert Gibbs, former adviser to president Barack Obama, said that Santorum went well over the line when he questioned Obama’s Christian values. Gibbs goes on and tells ABC News this week that “it’s time to get rid of this mindset in our politics that if we disagree, we have to question character and faith.” (Keep in mind that President Obama just last week attacked the faith of the Christian church.)
Well, Mr. Gibbs, what happened to Obama’s declaration that “transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency”? To whom do you think you’re talking, Mr. Gibbs? Some paid scoundrel in Obama’s administration? You are talking to Americans who have been eating the fruit of Obama’s unlawful and un-Christian administration since his first day in office.
A man in private and a man in public are one in the same. Obama’s faith is an expression of who he is and what it is that he does. The act cannot be apart from the actor. After all, Obama is the one who said, “Faith is not just something you have, it’s something you do.”
You can always tell if a stick is crooked by laying a straight one next to it. In the same way, you can tell if someone is acting unlawfully or unconstitutionally by weighing his actions next to the Constitution. You can also measure a man’s Christianity by judging him according to his fruit, the way that Jesus commanded the church to do, the same way you do a tree when it bears its fruit (Matthew 7:20).
Mr. Gibbs must be suggesting that our forefathers were way off base when resisting a tyrant named King George. After all, it was our forefathers who coined the phrase, “Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God” (Ben Franklin).
Nowhere in Scripture can you find God commanding His people to subject themselves to decrees that run contrary to His will. What? Obey a tyrant and disobey God? It doesn’t work that way in America.
When we look at history, we can see many tyrants and dictators used their pretended conversion to control and put to sleep the Christians, to conquer them by use of the Cross. They might look, act and talk like a Christian, at least publicly, all in hopes that the people would not judge them by the fruit they bore. The sad fact is that it works for some because the people accept what the tyrants say instead of judging what they do.
Remember, nobody rebuked hypocrites more than Jesus Christ Himself. So, I say, question the president’s faith. It is your job to do so, because clearly it doesn’t line up.
Watch the video below. You pick the next world leader by questioning candidates’ character and faith:
Want to support the Sons of Liberty/You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International’s efforts to restore America to its Biblical and Constitutional foundation?
Hate Crimes! Hate crimes! The homosexual radicals are trying to push an illegal agenda through hate crimes, not understanding that all crime is motivated by hate. What is this really about? And who’s doing the hating?
Obama appointed Chai Feldblum, an open lesbian who was nominated to serve as commissioner of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Chai stated, “I believe granting liberty to gay people advances a compelling government interest, that such an interest cannot be adequately advanced if ‘pockets of resistance’ to a societal statement of equality are permitted to flourish, and hence that a law that permits no individual exceptions based on religious beliefs will be the least restrictive means of achieving the goal of liberty for gay people.”
The devil is in the details. Chai said it is a “compelling government interest,” that there can be no “pockets of resistance,” and “a law that permits no individual exceptions based on religious beliefs.” What are they saying? “We want it our way by any means necessary, even if we have to turn the law against itself and make law-abiding citizens out to be law-breakers.” This is a totalitarian mindset.
This explains the Matthew Shepard distorted “hate crimes” law, which has been exposed by ABC’s 20/20 as having nothing to do with Matthew’s sexual orientation. This also explains the supposed “anti-bullying” policy being shoved down students’ throats in public schools, like it or not.
Interesting, this well exposes the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network’s (GLSEN) statement conceiving the supposed anti-bullying policies which told on themselves when they said that anti-bullying is really about promoting “affirmation” of homosexual behavior in the school system.
Therefore, homosexual radicals have created a “play the victim” position to advance their agenda of hate by bullying anyone who opposes their behavior.
They are trying to teach people to hate the laws that expose their perversion. It is bigotry in reverse.
All the way until 1961, sodomy was illegal in every state. If you were caught in the act of sodomy in Rhode Island, you could be thrown in jail for up to 20 years. Until 1973, homosexuality was considered a mental illness. Now they are attempting to force Americans to accept homosexual behavior, or it will be considered hate if anyone dare stand up against it.
Watch video below that exposes the Matthew Shepard lie, and columnist Melanie Phillips receiving death threats by homosexual radicals for protecting students in the U.K.:
Want to support the Sons of Liberty/You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International’s efforts to restore America to its Biblical and Constitutional foundation?
YCRBYCHI Marks the Southern Poverty Law Center as the REAL Hate Group
Recently, Sheriff John Cooke from Weld County, Colo., said the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), who labels anyone its officials disagree with politically as “hate groups,” holds no credibility.
For example, SPLC currently lists 26 “hate groups,” mainly Christian/conservative organizations, solely because of their stance on traditional marriage as our God and our founders intended.
SPLC has also targeted family-oriented and pro-American organizations and individuals such as:
American Family Association
Coral Ridge Ministries
You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International
Glenn Beck
Ron Paul
Michele Bachmann
Judge Andrew Napolitano
Chuck Baldwin
Joseph Farah
Gun Owners of America
The tea party
Oath Keepers
Concerned Women for America
Groups that wish to protect our borders from illegal immigrants
You have here the criminal calling out the lawful as the enemy, and those who hate the U.S. Constitution calling those who are patriotic the haters. This is like the tyrant King George who, instead of honoring our forefathers, called them “dangerous and designing men” – yet who was “dangerous and designing”?
A little homework into the Southern Poverty Law Center clarified its true mission: Make money while working hand in glove with the mainstream media to attack America’s foundation using a Communist/Marxist agenda.
Let me explain: SPLC’s founder is lawyer Morris Dees who in 1961 earned money by doing legal work for the Ku Klux Klan. That information alone brings enough red flags to expose SPLC as an illegitimate and anti-American organization.
Dees founded SPLC in 1971, after the civil rights battle had been won and there was no more money left in representing groups like the KKK. He now jumped to the other side of the fence, masquerading as a “civil rights organization dedicating to fighting hate and bigotry, and seeking justice for the most vulnerable members of society.” Interesting, because in 1986 SPLC’s entire staff quit in protest of Dees’ refusal to “address issues such as homelessness, voter registration and affirmative action – that they considered far more pertinent to poor minorities …” (Harper’s Magazine).
In the mid-1990′s, the SPLC ventured beyond beating the twice-dead horse of chasing KKK members, obviously because Americans no longer viewed them as a threat. They no longer raised enough support to rake in on the racial issue, so they now found a new focus: organizations that stand for America’s moral values. Today, as this administration attempts to trample the Constitution underfoot, the SPLC has decided to create new “victims” to cash in on.
The SPLC even goes so far as to repeatedly align with a variety of hate-driven, anti-American political groups, including communists and communist-friendly individuals and organizations.
Eric Holder: “Brainwash” the Youth about Gun Control
Recently, Eric Holder’s “Fast and Furious” scheme has sparked outrage among the American people. The DOJ’s “Fast and Furious” operation placed guns into the hands of drug smugglers who have committed crimes through entrapment, which was directly responsible for the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. Holder’s ultimate goal was to circumvent his own criminal activity by blaming blame gun stores in America for selling the very guns that the ATF put in the hands of smugglers. Of course his plans were botched before they could lay the blame on the innocent.
We now find out that Holder has been contriving a gun grab for years. Recently it came to the light that Holder has been encouraging the media to “brainwash” the youth about how bad guns are.
What is interesting here is that the young are conveniently taught a “thug” mentality and how to commit the crimes through Hollywood and video games. In the meantime, corrupt politicians await to trample the Constitution and legislate new policies to disarm the American population when the crimes are committed. Is not this type of circumventing what Holder attempted to accomplish through Fast and Furious? Yes it is!
Thomas Jefferson stated that the whole purpose of government is to “ensure your rights,” not to take them away.
What this administration is attempting to do is similar to what Hitler, Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, or any other dictator has done. They blame the weapon rather than the person committing the crimes, and all the while they subtly encourage criminal activity.
Friends, this is not about guns, it is about control. And this issue is not to be overlooked, because gun rights stand between a free country and an enslaved, possibly an exterminated, people.
Article 2 of the American Bill of Rights states:
“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a FREE state, the RIGHT of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed (encroached upon).”
George Washington said that the right to bear arms is the “peoples’ liberty’s teeth.”
Thomas Jefferson said, “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.”
And in The Federalist No. 46, James Madison, known as the father of the Constitution stated, that the Constitution preserves “the advantage of being armed which Americans posses over the people of almost every other nation… (where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms.
Benjamin Franklin brings forth the affirmation to what James Madison stated when he said, “Never trust a government that doesn’t trust it’s own citizens with guns.”
The real question is: why are there some in America’s government who want to take away our right to bear arms? What is this all about? You decide.
The video below explains how 56 million have been exterminated in the 20th Century through the guise of gun control:
When I think of American heroes (George Washington, John Adams, Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, our veterans, etc.) or the heroes of the faith (Abraham, Moses, David, Joshua, Jesus Christ, etc.), I stop to think of their awful sacrifice, which they laid on the altar of freedom for each one of us to walk in. Our founders said, “…we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.”
Yet, today in this country I see many leaders in the Christian, Patriotic, and Conservative rings do nothing but talk in circles. Like a group of dogs chasing their tails, they say much and do nothing – they are capitulating diplomats. The more I become acquainted with America’s supposed leaders over the past 40 years, the more I am disheartened. I then understand why we are in trouble as a nation. In the meantime, the younger generations, of which I am a part, have been subjected to everything and protected from nothing…but the talk goes on.
Our veterans fight, bleed and die in foreign lands to uphold the Constitution and back here at home the American people are debating away what their veterans are sacrificing for. Instead of standing up and fighting for our God-given liberties, they sit down and talk.
What does this lack of leadership come to? I can tell you: saving face while relinquishing our American sovereignty unto a foreign power.
Can you imagine George Washington saying, “You know what guys? I know there is a serious price to be paid through the Revolutionary War, but our future posterity isn’t really worth it. Let’s set up another panel to discuss this.” Or can you imagine Moses taking a poll before leading the children of Israel out of Egypt? How about Jesus saying, before going to the cross to die for the sins of the world, “It is not at all expedient for my ministry to bear this shame in order to redeem mankind.”
As facetious as this might sound, this is exactly why America is in such a sad position. Our leaders have to be “politically correct” so they can hold on to their sponsors and their positions; they do not want to mar their reputation; they say it’s too radical to stand up in the face of tyranny, or to tell God’s truth because they might be called haters by a group of criminals. I say shame upon them. They lose face and their country while they try to save face; they are un-Christian, un-American, and un-Patriotic hypocrites! They need to understand that real love is demonstrated, not spoken of (1 John 3:18).
In conclusion, listen to what the second President of the United States, John Adams, stated when leaving his post to the American people:
“Posterity! You will never know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom! I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in Heaven that I ever took half the pains to preserve it.”
In the beginning of March, we loaded up our bus and set out for another school tour, ending in Dunkerton, Iowa. Nothing short of excellence fell to our posterity at each assembly.
The following morning, we received calls from the “state-run” media asking what our take was on the assembly program we performed in Dunkerton, Iowa. Little did we know, we were already splashed on the front page of the paper in Waterloo, Iowa, (close to Dunkerton) as an anti-gay ministry. Interesting … because homosexuality was a non-issue amongst the response of the students during the program. We knew of one teacher who was upset about the abortion piece (she did not want people to see publicly what she advocated). Other than that, we received the typical response of students flocking us for autographs and making comments or asking questions about the content presented.
It’s important to note that we hit national news once again on issues created by the socialist media, issues that didn’t exist during the program.
The propagandists reported the following (my explanations in parentheses):
“Not only did Dean show up and sing (I am not a singer), but he added to the entertainment by showing students images of fetuses (murdered babies) and spread his anti-woman (???) and anti-gay (I am pro-family) message.”
“… anti-gay, anti-choice (I am pro-life), right-wing Christian revisionist snake oil.”
“This group spreads anti-gay hate (hate doesn’t tell the truth) messages, teaches Christianity (if, to the media, referencing the Constitution is teaching Christianity, then they are right) in public schools, (and) distributes purposefully misleading information (the United States laws are very inconvenient for unlawful radicals).”
“… his anti-gay, anti-Semitic (I am a Christian), anti-Muslim (???) ministry …”
Folks, each time we hit the news, the propagandists pull another accusation out of the air and attempt to misrepresent who we are and what it is we do, because they are desperately afraid of being exposed. They cry “victim,” as they are trying to implement homosexual (queerifying the elementary schools) and abortion (without parental consent) indoctrination under your radar. They know if you find out what they are attempting to inundate your youth with in public schools, their agenda would come to a speedy halt.
The fact stands true that if you’re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating those that are being attacked and loving those that are doing the attacking.
We put a portion of the Dunkerton assembly regarding homosexuality, adultery, etc. on YouTube, and it received over 100,000 views within a week. It is currently at 159,000. Please keep in mind that we spend about 10 minutes out of a three-hour assembly on homosexuality and abortion. However, the propagandists used their usual tactic of putting words into my mouth, which came from Elton John who stated, “There is nothing wrong with going to bed with someone of your own sex. People should be very free with sex, they should draw the line at goats.” Should not the homosexual communities be outraged with Elton? Nope, Elton is good, Bradlee is bad! Isn’t it interesting that out of the 7,000 comments posted on one media outlet’s article, not one attended the assembly?
And here’s some breaking news for the propagandists: I didn’t even do the assembly. So I went back to Dunkerton, Iowa, to confront the socialist media, and here are the results:
What the socialist media are afraid of (warning: offensive content):
In light of the recent mainstream media-created outrage over Trayvon Martin’s death, I couldn’t help but notice how far off the modern-day civil-rights leaders are from the creed of the civil-rights movement in the 1960s, led by a great man of God, Martin Luther King Jr. He was a prophet to the nation – a molder of consensus to guarantee equal rights under the law for all men, “endowed by their Creator,” as the Declaration of Independence rightly states.
Let me take you back to the 1960s. Every participant in the civil-rights marches was required to sign the following pledge before they could participate:
1. Meditate on teachings of Jesus daily.
2. Remember that the non-violent movement seeks justice and reconciliation, not just victory.
3. Walk and talk in the manner of love/charity, for God is love.

4. Pray daily to be used by God.
5. Sacrifice personal needs. Greed has to go out the window.
6. Observe with both friend and foe the ordinary rules of courtesy.
7. Seek to perform regular service for others and for the world.
8. 
Refrain from the violence of fist, tongue or heart.
9. Strive to be in good spiritual and bodily health.
10. Follow the directions of the movement and of the captain of the demonstration.
However, the self-made civil-rights leaders of today, such as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, have left out their Bibles and their morals, as they debase themselves and reap nothing but mockery and reproach. Let me contrast the original pledge with the modern version of the pledge, as demonstrated by their actions:
1. Meditate on the media and anything but the teachings of Jesus.
2. Practice civil disobedience to just laws, through force, in hopes of an unjust victory.
3. Walk and talk in the manner of thuggery/pride!
4. Play the race card as you are enslaved through deception by a godless administration daily.
5. Sacrifice the needs of others, gain is the goal.
6. Send threats to those who disagree with you.
7. Seek to have it your way at all costs, lie if necessary.
8. Use fear and force.
9. Strive to take from others, because you deserve what you take!
10. Follow the directions of an unconstitutional and unlawful administration.
These modern civil-rights leaders are demoralizers of the faithful. They have turned civil rights into uncivil distribution of privileges, derived by the state. They have left off the Declaration of Independence, therefore throwing off freedom. Under their directives, racism is being taught to a new generation under the guise of decrying racism.
Martin Luther King Jr. condemned the “black power” movement because he knew “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” His point was that men were not to be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. The civil-rights movement was about truth and justice, not lies and injustice, which brings me to another point …
Look who else is trying to jump on the civil-rights wagon, using similar methods as explained above. Watch below:
NBC is again showing its antipathy for journalism and the First Amendment. The network’s utter disdain for truth and equity showcased in a pathetic apology made by email Tuesday for airing a carefully edited audio version of a 9-1-1 call placed by Florida neighborhood watch volunteer George Zimmerman, who shot Trayvon Martin to death in February.
“During our investigation it became evident that there was an error made in the production process that we deeply regret,” NBC News said in Tuesday’s statement. “We will be taking the necessary steps to prevent this from happening in the future and apologize to our viewers.”
NBC’s edited version stated:
Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. He looks black.
Actual 9-1-1 call unedited:
Zimmerman: This guy looks like he’s up to no good. Or he’s on drugs or something.
It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.
Dispatcher: OK, and this guy – is he white, black or Hispanic?
Zimmerman: He looks black.
This is a lot more than a simple “error on the production process.” This is a purposed omission to batter ram an agenda on the American people.
I recall my own personal experience with Rachel Maddow and MSNBC explained in the video below. Rachel took an entire minute out of the center of a comment I made on my radio program, “The Sons of Liberty.” She turned my statement that Muslims were calling for the execution of homosexuals (in Washington, D.C.) to mean that I was calling for their execution as well. She didn’t report that only once in August 2010, but again in May 2011, heightening the accusation and removing my disclaimer in her second report.
Rachel disparaged my name, my profession and my religious beliefs in an outrageous and shocking display of malicious intent to destroy my reputation, my ministry and my mission to “reshape America by re-directing the current and future generations both morally and spiritually through education, media and the Judeo-Christian values found in our U.S. Constitution.”
The repercussions of NBC/MSNBC’s false criminal reporting, in both the Zimmerman case and mine, has led to death threats, the posting of home addresses online and the endangerment of innocent lives.
Why would NBC do something like this? In this day and age, could the press be a means to make a story exist that fits its own agenda – no matter what it might cost others?
These pre-meditated attacks must be confronted head-on lawfully – and I intend to do just that for our posterity’s sake. Enough is enough.
